Add Rule "Or" Operator
under review
S
Sam Larson
When creating rules, allow an "or" operator. This would be super helpful in consolidating rules with similar purposes for example "if from account A OR account B, do this" or "if payee is this OR that".
Additionally it would be super nice to have multiple AND statements for the same field. For example "payee contains xxx AND payee does not contain yyy" This came up when "atm withdrawl" was also including "atm fee" transactions, so I could do "AND payee does not include fee"
Log In
A
Amber Nicole
yes, this + a "NOT" operator.
A
Anthony Chapligin
Would love to see the OR function across all rules/filters. For example I want all my Amazon transactions to have a payee set as Amazon, but the payee names sometimes come in as AMZN or Amaz On Ca or AMAZONCA etc. I used Payee contains rule for "Amazon", but it doesn't catch them all.
R
Ricardo Marques
Please add this! Should be simple enough and it will make things much easier as a user.
P
Phil
Yes I agree with all of Sam's points. Multiple AND statements for the same field would be especially helpful.
K
Krishn Ramesh
+1 to this. Currently only the AND operator is supported which leads to lots of redundant and duplicative rules. OR operator would help simplify!
J
J Evangeline Kubin
Yes! A "does NOT contain" modifier would be a great addition.
A
Amber Nicole
J Evangeline Kubin Came here to say this! "does NOT contain" is much needed!
Jen from Lunch Money
under review